| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1061. Tech 3 Ship - Feedback Thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
In stead of roles, what about mechanics? (last minute perhaps but w/e) What if; T3 ships acted like learning implants? You had to be in one to gain the benefit of the +1-+2 skill point learning but as you lose sp for getting one blown up, it wou...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.26 20:55:00
|
1062. Tech 3 Ship - Feedback Thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
need to assign bandwidth to more loki subsystems ____ My Blog Is Awesome
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.25 22:38:00
|
1063. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Shadowsword Originally by: CCP Dionysus Hi there. What sort of balancing are you looking for to make them useful? I dont necessarily mean exact numbers, but what are you looking to do with t3 ships? They are not m...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.25 16:32:00
|
1064. Are we losing two subsystems per type? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 25/02/2009 16:31:14 Originally by: CCP t0rfifrans The time the fifth variation will be launched is dependant on the interest and pick-up of T3 ships. Isn't this backwards? You have the potential to make ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.25 16:25:00
|
1065. Proposal: More T1 ships - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
____ My Blog Is Awesome
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.25 13:38:00
|
1066. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 25/02/2009 13:27:43 If you don't want them to be fundamentally different functionality wise, or superior capabilities wise, than t2/t1, get rid of the additional risk/cost. Get rid of sp loss on death, make producti...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.25 13:24:00
|
1067. Are we losing two subsystems per type? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 25/02/2009 13:10:34 Unless i'm reading this wrong, we're only getting 1 epic mission arc for release... Originally by: CCP Big Dumb Object Edited by: CCP Big Dumb Object on 24/02/2009 18:08:08 Edite...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.25 13:08:00
|
1068. A brief expression of "So whats the point?" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Aphoticus Greetings, I thought I read somewhere that the skill point lost is only by one step; 1 to 0, 2 to 1, etc. Can this be confirmed? Confirmed Originally by: Aphoticus I also read somewhere that if it di...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.25 01:58:00
|
1069. Are we losing two subsystems per type? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 25/02/2009 01:43:05 Our interpretation of the Apocrypha Feature list ____ My Blog Is Awesome
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.25 01:42:00
|
1070. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Kagura Nikon ooo did you missed the part where you can make a cuiser that deals 470 dps and can tank 630 dps perma running that setup? Like an ishtar with a passive shield tank... ? ____ My Blog Is Awesome
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.25 01:40:00
|
1071. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
bugs... Engineering 2 + propulsion 2 and afterburnner almost always results with no cap recharge, (although the client/UI displays the capacitor recharge and tool tip information) Workaround - turn of mwd Bandwidth poorly assigned to most ship c...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.22 05:54:00
|
1072. Fitting Screen suggested fixes (thread #2331231) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Unlike most, I like the essence of the fitting screen as it puts into focus one of the biggest aspects of pvp - ship configurations... My really rough mock up are a collection of I would love added as polish that would improve functionality of ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.21 11:33:00
|
1073. A brief expression of "So whats the point?" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 21/02/2009 01:41:46 I come from the position that things are balanced pretty well. Beyond the perennial calls for nerfs and boosts that we all take part in, the game has settled into some sort of equilibrium in whic...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.21 01:37:00
|
1074. Bellum's giant T3/UI Art crit thread of fun and win \o/ - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
reasonably objective comments for the most part bang on about the UI, and some aspects about how general design traits didn't quite make the conversion to t3 but on the outside, all we can really offer is constructive critisim, and free beer when...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.20 20:22:00
|
1075. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Also, 3 components per subsystem or 5 for release? ____ My Blog Is Awesome
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.20 12:57:00
|
1076. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I for one welcome our new strategic cruiser overlords Thanks for the first hint of where this ships are going! <3 t3 ____ My Blog Is Awesome
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.20 12:54:00
|
1077. Attention all CSM members - take action now! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Do I need my RP hat on for this one? ____ My Blog Is Awesome
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.19 20:55:00
|
1078. New CSM role (mostly PR-like) : "ask a developer" column editors - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Escalated. ____ My Blog Is Awesome
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.19 09:43:00
|
1079. [Issue] Tempest vs Mealstrom v2 - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
8/10 ____ My Blog Is Awesome
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.17 15:48:00
|
1080. [Issue] Tempest vs Mealstrom v2 - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 17/02/2009 02:25:30 Originally by: Tzar'rim I very much like option #2, as I'm not really into a 'spreadsheetlike' solution like making projectiles fall inbetween lasers and hybrids. Would make for a very d...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2009.02.17 02:17:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |